<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Navy sinking skeptics?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.runawaydaily.com/2010/08/17/us-navy-sinking-skeptics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.runawaydaily.com/2010/08/17/us-navy-sinking-skeptics/</link>
	<description>A Climate Change Blog by Floyd Earl Smith</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: opit</title>
		<link>http://www.runawaydaily.com/2010/08/17/us-navy-sinking-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>opit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runawaydaily.com/?p=89#comment-682</guid>
		<description>What - no innocent until proven guilty ?
That&#039;s the danger of rampant self-righteousness : no comparison of disparate views.
I can help.
opitslinkfest.blogspot.com &gt; Topical Index
Climate in Contention
Perception Alteration
( the second collection was originally named after the framing technique for Moving the Goalposts known as Moving the Overton Window. It deals with shifting from discussion to aggressively changing what seems realistic using psychological techniques which are not noticed by the subject. )
And no, I do not &#039;deny&#039; Climate Change.
Rather than deny &#039;science&#039;, I deny reporting promulgated as dispassionate and fair is anything of that nature...any more than corporate polluters&#039; representatives are.
It&#039;s a staged confrontation channeling thought in circles of futility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What &#8211; no innocent until proven guilty ?<br />
That&#8217;s the danger of rampant self-righteousness : no comparison of disparate views.<br />
I can help.<br />
opitslinkfest.blogspot.com &gt; Topical Index<br />
Climate in Contention<br />
Perception Alteration<br />
( the second collection was originally named after the framing technique for Moving the Goalposts known as Moving the Overton Window. It deals with shifting from discussion to aggressively changing what seems realistic using psychological techniques which are not noticed by the subject. )<br />
And no, I do not &#8216;deny&#8217; Climate Change.<br />
Rather than deny &#8217;science&#8217;, I deny reporting promulgated as dispassionate and fair is anything of that nature&#8230;any more than corporate polluters&#8217; representatives are.<br />
It&#8217;s a staged confrontation channeling thought in circles of futility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WitsEnd</title>
		<link>http://www.runawaydaily.com/2010/08/17/us-navy-sinking-skeptics/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>WitsEnd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 22:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.runawaydaily.com/?p=89#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Did he explicitly link the warming with humans causing greenhouse gas emissions?

Some deniers will admit there is incontrovertible evidence of warming, but pretend it is &quot;natural&quot;.

haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did he explicitly link the warming with humans causing greenhouse gas emissions?</p>
<p>Some deniers will admit there is incontrovertible evidence of warming, but pretend it is &#8220;natural&#8221;.</p>
<p>haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

